Antitrust Regulators Address Business Collaboration Designed to Combat COVID-19
In yet another example of the exigencies prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic, the federal agencies charged with enforcement of the antitrust laws announced expedited procedures and other guidance designed to facilitate cooperation among companies to combat the spread of the virus and mitigate its impact on public health and safety.
In a joint announcement, the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice and the Bureau of Competition of the Federal Trade Commission sought to make clear "that there are many ways firms, including competitors, can engage in procompetitive collaboration" in the face of the pandemic. In particular, the agencies (i) announced expedited process for companies and individuals to ask the agencies to evaluate proposed collaborations related to COVID-19, and (ii) where businesses seek to act even more quickly, provided informal guidance on when such actions may serve lawful, procompetitive ends.
First, the Antitrust Division announced that it would aim to respond expeditiously to all requests through its Business Review Process that relate to COVID-19 and, for those requests addressing public health and safety, within seven days of the receipt of all necessary information. The Antitrust Division also detailed how such requests should be made. Likewise, the Competition Bureau described its own expedited process by which businesses can seek a staff advisory opinion on proposed activities related to COVID-19.
Second, and significantly, both agencies recognized that some companies and individuals "may need to act immediately in addressing this ongoing pandemic," and that many such activities would be consistent with the antitrust laws. To drive home the point, the agencies enumerated several examples that may fall within this category, such as collaboration on research and development, sharing of technical know-how, development of suggested practice parameters and joint purchasing arrangements among health care providers. They acknowledged that health care facilities may need to collaborate in offering resources and services "to communities without immediate access to personal protective equipment, medical supplies, or health care," and that other types of businesses may have to "temporarily combine production, distribution, or service networks" for supplies related to COVID-19.
Just as with other federal and state authorities in recent days, however, both the Antitrust Division and the Competition Bureau cautioned against any use of the COVID-19 pandemic for unlawful gain. The agencies vowed to pursue civil and criminal violations of the antitrust laws.
For more Day Pitney alerts and articles related to the impact of COVID-19, as well as information from other reliable sources, please visit our COVID-19 Resource Center.
COVID-19 DISCLAIMER: As you are aware, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, things are changing quickly and the effect, enforceability and interpretation of laws may be affected by future events. The material set forth in this document is not an unequivocal statement of law, but instead represents our best interpretation of where things stand as of the date of first publication. We have not attempted to address the potential impacts of all local, state and federal orders that may have been issued in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Recommended
The arrival of recently retired former Chief Justice of the Connecticut Supreme Court Richard A. Robinson to Day Pitney's Litigation department and Appellate practice was featured in CT News Junkie.
The arrival of Richard Robinson to Day Pitney's Litigation department as a partner was featured in Bloomberg Law. Robinson was previously the Chief Justice of the Connecticut Supreme Court.
Day Pitney Litigation Partner Mark A. Romance has been appointed to serve as co-chair of the Pretrial Practice and Discovery Committee of the 202409, one of the largest sections of the ABA. In his role, Romance will work with the committee to increase membership, deliver meaningful benefits to members, and implement the goals and strategies of the Section's strategic plan. The appointment is effective for one year. Recently, Romance completed his third term as co-chair of the Commercial and Business Litigation Committee.
Day Pitney White Collar Attorney Stan Twardy was quoted in the Law360 article, "Trump Prosecutor Restarts Precarious Road To DC Trial."
Day Pitney Litigation Partner Paul Marino was featured in Law360's article titled, "New Jersey Cases Attorneys Are Watching in 2024."
Day Pitney Litigation Partner Naju Lathia was featured in the article, "NJ, Attys Brace For Tech 'Evolution' in Litigation."
Day Pitney New York Litigation Partners Gregory R. Bruno and Alfred W. J. Marks authored the article "The Dead Man's Statute: Effectively Employing CPLR 4519" for the New York Law Journal.
In a hotly contested case, Day Pitney attorneys Michael K. Furey and Kevin J. Duffy obtained a ruling by the court prior to trial dismissing malpractice and other claims asserted against a major New Jersey law firm and one its partners by a former client.
Day Pitney is proud to announce that two of our Connecticut-based attorneys and our Litigation department have been recognized by the Connecticut Law Tribune as part of their second annual New England Legal Awards. According to the publication, the awards recognize exceptional attorneys and firms from Connecticut, Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire, Massachusetts and Rhode Island across various legal domains.
Day Pitney Press Release