In a recently issued Private Letter Ruling (PLR 201825003), the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) held that a donor's gift of works of art, in which the donor retained a life interest via a usufruct to two museums, would be a completed gift for U.S. gift tax purposes even though the donor reserved the option to terminate the gift under certain circumstances. In so holding, the IRS concluded that because the options for revocation were not within the control of the donor, she did not retain sufficient dominion and control over the donated art to cause the gifts to be incomplete.
According to the facts set forth in the PLR, the donor and her late husband intended to donate a number of works from their art collection to two non-U.S. museums. Before her husband's death, they entered into a deed of transfer (the Deed) with the museums, granting legal title and the remainder interest in the works to the museums and expressly reserving a usufruct interest in the works that would terminate at the death of the surviving spouse. Similar to a life estate, a usufruct is a civil law concept referring to the right to use and enjoy property for a defined period of time without damaging or diminishing it. Pursuant to the Deed, the donor was permitted to retain physical possession of the artworks during her life, but was prohibited from selling or otherwise disposing of the works.
The Deed also gave the donor the option to revoke the gifts under a number of conditions, including failure by the museum to comply with certain care and custody requirements, changes to foreign law, and privatization of the museum. The Deed also provided that if the IRS determined that the grants to the museums were completed gifts for federal gift tax purposes, which the Deed explicitly stated was not the donor's intent, the Deed would not come into force.
Ultimately, the IRS concluded that, but for the provision requiring a favorable ruling by the IRS, the gifts were complete. Citing Treasury Regulations § 25.2511-2(b), the IRS discussed that a gift is considered complete where the donor has parted with all dominion and control of the property such that the donor has no power to change its disposition. Only where the donor reserves power over the disposition of the property will the gift be considered incomplete. Applying this fact-specific inquiry, the IRS concluded that the donor did not retain sufficient dominion and control over the works of art to cause the gifts to be considered incomplete. Although the donor retained the option to revoke the gifts if particular conditions were met, the IRS did not consider this to amount to retained dominion and control by the donor because the conditions set forth in the Deed were not dependent on any act of the donor and thus entirely beyond her control. As such, her ability to revoke the gift did not amount to a retained interest in the artworks that would make the gifts incomplete. Based on that rationale, the IRS concluded that the donor's grant to the museums of the remainder interest in the artworks would be a completed gift for federal gift tax purposes notwithstanding her intent and conditional option to revoke the gift.
Day Pitney Trusts and Estates Partner Tasha Dickinson was featured in the CNBC Select article, "Living Trust vs. a Will – What's the Best Way to Pass an Inheritance to Your Family."
Day Pitney Private Client Department Chair B. Dane Dudley was featured in the Hartford Business Journal article, "Multigenerational Shift: Navigating Great Wealth Transfer is a Boon for Attorneys, Estate/Investment Planners."
Day Pitney Trusts and Estates Partner Tasha Dickinson and Senior Associate Stephanie Eassa Rapp were recognized by the Palm Beach Illustrated as "Top Lawyers in 2023," in its September 2023 issue.
Four Day Pitney Boca Raton Attorneys were recognized by the Boca Raton Observer as "Top Lawyers in 2023."
Day Pitney Trusts and Estates Partner Tasha K. Dickinson was featured in a Q&A article, "How to Plan for a Generational Wealth Transfer When You Have a Blended Family," by GOBankingRates.
Day Pitney Trusts and Estates Partner Tasha Dickinson was featured in Capital Analytics Associates' Invest: West Palm Beach Q&A, where she discussed the firm, diversity and the South Florida legal market.
Day Pitney Trusts and Estates Partner Tasha Dickinson was featured in the Daily Business Review's article, "'Elephant in the Room': Day Pitney Attorney Weighs in on Dianne Feinstein Feud," discussing Feinstein's feud with her late husband's children over his estate.
Day Pitney's Providence office move was featured in the article, "Day Pitney Moves Providence Law Office to 100 Westminster," by Providence Business First.
Day Pitney Trusts and Estates Attorneys Andrew M. Nerney and Grant W. Silvester authored the article, "U.S. Appeals Court: Deathbed Checks Are Includible in Decedent's Estate," for WealthManagement.com, which discusses a recent ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals in the Third Circuit on deathbed gifting.
Day Pitney Private Client Department Senior Associate Claire N. Carrabba authored the article, "The Tax-Saving Potential of Gifts and Sales to Family Trusts," for WealthManagement.com.
Copyright © 2023 Day Pitney LLP, all rights reserved.