Day Pitney Secures Summary Judgment for St. Vincent's Medical Center
Publisher: Day Pitney Press Release
April 16, 2021
Day Pitney secured a significant victory for firm client St. Vincent's Medical Center in a litigation matter pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut. After nearly four years of litigation, the court granted Day Pitney's motion for summary judgment.
The plaintiff alleged that, while he was under the care of St. Vincent's, he was sedated without his consent. The plaintiff asserted several common law tort claims against St. Vincent's that typically might elude summary judgment. However, Day Pitney successfully argued that the plaintiff was barred from challenging the absence of informed consent, and therefore, could not establish an essential element of his claims, because Bridgeport police executed a written request. The court's ruling, which adopted Day Pitney's reasoning, is the first decision granting summary judgment for a hospital on the basis of an "emergency exception" to the doctrine of informed consent under Connecticut law, and, going forward, should be reliable authority for similarly situated defendants.
Paul Williams led the Day Pitney team, and Andrew Ammirati drafted the summary judgment briefs and the winning arguments.
Day Pitney Litigation Partners Gregory Bruno and Alfred W.J. Marks authored "Don't Believe Everything You Read Online: Recent Sanctions Decision Offers Cautionary Tale of Generative AI Risks" for the New York Law Journal's Special Litigation Section.
Day Pitney Artificial Intelligence Committee Chair Kritika Bharadwaj and Healthcare and Technology Associate Colton Kopcik authored the article "Generative AI in Health Care: Diagnosing the Legal Landscape for Dr. GenAI" for the New York Law Journal's Legal Technology Special Section.