Day Pitney remains committed to providing quality legal counsel, while protecting our clients and employees, and transforming our communities into more just, equal and equitable spaces. For more information, please visit our COVID-19 Resource Center | Racial Justice and Equity Task Force.
In the aftermath of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the United States and many of its allies have imposed new or enhanced sanctions on a growing list of persons and entities.[1] Sanctions are generally administered by the U.S. Department of Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), and their enforcement regime is aggressive and comprehensive.[2] It is likely that OFAC's attention will focus in the coming months on Russia-related sanctions, and that the U.S. government's current Ukraine/Russia-Related Sanctions program will not only expand, but accelerate.[3] And even unintentional violations can result in significant penalties and reputational harm.
Many of our clients have compliance programs in place to address sanctions, sometimes managed in-house, and sometimes outsourced. The basic compliance method employed by many companies has been relatively simple—comparing clients, customers or counter-parties against the OFAC lists—and these lists are generally available online, or through commercial vendors. In light of the unprecedented scope of the new wave of Russian sanctions, we strongly recommend that our clients review their sanctions compliance program against the expanded sanctions list.
If you do not have a program, we suggest that you reassess whether one is needed. Factors militating in favor of such a program include having overseas customers, purchasing materials from overseas, hiring overseas contractors or other vendors, and considering the sectors in which your company operates against the OFAC regime.
If you have a program, you should evaluate, as an initial matter, whether it is structured to capture individuals or entities that have been added to sanctions lists since you began the commercial relationship. Now is also a good time to consider whether your sanction compliance program is convenient to use, and cost effective.
In general, many sanctions compliance programs are not particularly expensive or time consuming. Investing in a solid program can be important, because sanctions violations can result in significant, costly fines, and even unintentional violations of the sanctions regime have resulted in penalties in the millions of dollars.[4]
Sanctions, particularly now, are an area where an ounce of protection is worth a pound of cure. If you have questions or need more information, Day Pitney lawyers, including our Government Enforcement team, and our Defense and International Trade Controls business partners at FH+H[5], are here to assist.
On May 26, Washington, D.C. Counsel Steven Cash will be guest speaking at The University of Texas, Intelligence Studies Project "Texas Intelligence Academy."
White Collar attorneys John Vukelj, Sarah Krissoff and Gregory R. Bruno authored an article for the New York Law Journal titled, "Stock Trading Plan Rule Amendments Augur Changes to Securities Fraud Litigation."
New York Litigation Partner Sarah Krissoff was featured on Australia's "A Current Affair" television program discussing the $450 million superyacht, called the Amadea, that was boarded by Fijian Police as part of the U.S. Government's KleptoCapture Task Force.
Day Pitney White Collar and General Criminal Defense Partner Sarah Krissoff was featured in Reuters' Fast Take video titled, "Trump's Consequences for Ignoring N.Y. Subpoena."
Day Pitney White Collar and General Criminal Defense Partner Sarah Krissoff was quoted in the Reuters article, "New York Judge Holds Trump in Contempt for Failing to Comply with Subpoena."
On April 11, Day Pitney White Collar and General Criminal Defense partner Sarah Krissoff was a guest on Court TV, where she provided commentary on the cases of the day.
Day Pitney White Collar Partner Sarah Krissoff was featured in The List's article, "Ghislaine Maxwell's Family Sounds Off About The Court's Latest Ruling In Her Case."
Judge Christopher Droney (ret.) and Matthew Austin co-authored the article, "The Investigation and Enforcement Landscape Under the Garland Department of Justice," for the New York Law Journal.
This website may use cookies, pixel tags and other passive tracking technologies, including Google Analytics, to improve functionality and performance. For more information, see our Privacy Policy. By using our website, you are consenting to our use of these tracking technologies. You can alter the configuration of your browser to refuse to accept cookies, but if you do so, it is possible that some areas of web sites that use cookies will not function properly when you view them. To learn more about how to delete and manage cookies, refer to the support instructions for each browser (e.g., see AllAboutCookies.org). You may locate Google Analytics' currently available opt-outs for the web here.
This website may use cookies, pixel tags and other passive tracking technologies, including Google Analytics, to improve functionality and performance. For more information, see our Privacy Policy. By using our website, you are consenting to our use of these tracking technologies. You can alter the configuration of your browser to refuse to accept cookies, but if you do so, it is possible that some areas of web sites that use cookies will not function properly when you view them. To learn more about how to delete and manage cookies, refer to the support instructions for each browser (e.g., see AllAboutCookies.org). You may locate Google Analytics' currently available opt-outs for the web here.