Day Pitney remains committed to providing quality legal counsel, while protecting our clients and employees, and transforming our communities into more just, equal and equitable spaces. For more information, please visit our COVID-19 Resource Center | Racial Justice and Equity Task Force.

Insights

Publications Events

Supreme Court Resolves Circuit Split and Narrows the Scope of the TCPA

Publisher: Day Pitney Cybersecurity, Health and Technology (C.H.A.T.) Newsletter
June 1, 2021
Day Pitney Author(s) Erin Magennis Healy

The Supreme Court has resolved the complex question of what equipment qualifies as an automatic telephonic dialing system (ATDS), or autodialer, under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (TCPA) by unanimously ruling that equipment must use a random or sequential number generator in order to meet the definition. The anticipated decision in Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid resolves a long-standing circuit split.

Under the TCPA, an "automatic telephonic dialing system" is defined as equipment with the capacity

(A) to store or produce telephone numbers to be called, using a random or sequential number generator; and

(B) to dial such numbers.

The Facebook case turned on whether the clause "using a random or sequential number generator" modifies both verbs that precede it ("store" and "produce") or only the closer one ("produce").

The Ninth Circuit previously held that the recipients of unwanted text messages properly stated a TCPA claim by alleging that Facebook engaged in autodialing by (i) storing numbers to be called and (ii) dialing such numbers automatically.

Reversing the Ninth Circuit, the Court concluded that Facebook did not use an ATDS because its technology did not use a random sequential number generator to create phone numbers but rather sent text messages to phone numbers that were linked to specific accounts. The Court commented that expanding the definition of ATDS to include any equipment that merely stores and dials telephone numbers would capture virtually all cell phones and subject ordinary cell phone owners to penalties under the TCPA.

The TCPA creates a private right of action for individuals who receive unlawful calls or text messages from autodialers. The Supreme Court's decision will have significant implications for class action litigation and provides clarity for businesses that use automated calls and text messages to communicate with customers, including digital health companies that engage with patients via text messaging.




Would you like to receive our Day Pitney C.H.A.T. Newsletter? Sign up here.


Recommended
Related Professionals
Parsippany, NJ
T: (973) 966 8138
Boston, MA
T: (617) 345 4872
Hartford, CT
T: (860) 275 0168
Stamford, CT
T: (203) 977 7418
Hartford, CT
New Haven, CT
T: (860) 275 0294
Stamford, CT
T: (203) 977 7368
Parsippany, NJ
T: (973) 966 8115
New York, NY
T: (212) 297 2477
Parsippany, NJ
T: (973) 966 8041
Washington, DC
T: (202) 218 3904
Parsippany, NJ
T: (973) 966 8154