The Supreme Court has resolved the complex question of what equipment qualifies as an automatic telephonic dialing system (ATDS), or autodialer, under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (TCPA) by unanimously ruling that equipment must use a random or sequential number generator in order to meet the definition. The anticipated decision in Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid resolves a long-standing circuit split.
Under the TCPA, an "automatic telephonic dialing system" is defined as equipment with the capacity
(A) to store or produce telephone numbers to be called, using a random or sequential number generator; and
(B) to dial such numbers.
The Facebook case turned on whether the clause "using a random or sequential number generator" modifies both verbs that precede it ("store" and "produce") or only the closer one ("produce").
The Ninth Circuit previously held that the recipients of unwanted text messages properly stated a TCPA claim by alleging that Facebook engaged in autodialing by (i) storing numbers to be called and (ii) dialing such numbers automatically.
Reversing the Ninth Circuit, the Court concluded that Facebook did not use an ATDS because its technology did not use a random sequential number generator to create phone numbers but rather sent text messages to phone numbers that were linked to specific accounts. The Court commented that expanding the definition of ATDS to include any equipment that merely stores and dials telephone numbers would capture virtually all cell phones and subject ordinary cell phone owners to penalties under the TCPA.
The TCPA creates a private right of action for individuals who receive unlawful calls or text messages from autodialers. The Supreme Court's decision will have significant implications for class action litigation and provides clarity for businesses that use automated calls and text messages to communicate with customers, including digital health companies that engage with patients via text messaging.
Would you like to receive our Day Pitney C.H.A.T. Newsletter? Sign up here.
Day Pitney Healthcare, Life Sciences, and Technology Counsel Damian Privitera's arrival was featured in the Law360 article "Moses & Singer Healthcare Atty Joins Day Pitney in Hartford."
Day Pitney Healthcare Partner Magda Rodriguez authored the article "When Physician Retirement Arrangements May Be Legal" for Law360.
Day Pitney Cybersecurity, Healthcare and Technology (C.H.A.T.) Newsletter – February 2024
Day Pitney Cybersecurity, Healthcare and Technology (C.H.A.T.) Newsletter – February 2024
Day Pitney Artificial Intelligence Committee Chair Kritika Bharadwaj and Healthcare and Technology Associate Colton Kopcik authored the article "Generative AI in Health Care: Diagnosing the Legal Landscape for Dr. GenAI" for the New York Law Journal's Legal Technology Special Section.
Day Pitney Alert
Day Pitney Miami Healthcare Partner Magda Rodriguez was recently featured in a Q&A with her alma mater, Gulliver Prep's, alum newsletter.
Day Pitney Cybersecurity, Healthcare and Technology (C.H.A.T.) Newsletter – December 2023
Day Pitney Cybersecurity, Healthcare and Technology (C.H.A.T.) Newsletter – December 2023
Copyright © 2024 Day Pitney LLP, all rights reserved.