Day Pitney remains committed to providing quality legal counsel, while protecting our clients and employees, and transforming our communities into more just, equal and equitable spaces. For more information, please visit our COVID-19 Resource Center | Racial Justice and Equity Task Force.

Insights

Publications Events

More Regulation for Urgent Care and Retail Clinics?

Publisher: Day Pitney Cybersecurity, Health and Technology (C.H.A.T.) Newsletter
June 1, 2021
Day Pitney Author(s) Susan R. Huntington

During the pandemic, urgent care and retail clinics have served a key role in meeting the high demand for COVID-19 testing and treatment. However, a recently published briefing report, Making "Convenient Care" the Right Care for All: Improving State Oversight of Urgent Care Centers and Retail Health Clinics (the Report), raises concerns about whether such delivery sites are adequately regulated and whether, in the absence of additional regulation, access to care is being denied to certain populations. The Report was published by two consumer advocacy groups, the Community Catalyst and the National Health Law Program, and draws on the results of a 50-state survey, which is included in the Report.

The Report found that only about 10 states directly regulate or license urgent care or retail clinics, with the rest of the states allowing such clinics to function as physician's offices, which are generally not regulated by any state agency. In the absence of state regulation, such sites function independently and can choose which payers they accept. The Report cites a 2019 survey that estimated 30 percent to 40 percent of urgent care centers refuse to treat patients with Medicaid. The Report concludes that without state-based requirements to accept patients regardless of payment source, there is no way to ensure low-income patients are able to access and afford services at these sites of care.

Another issue raised in the Report is the lack of continuity of care. Because these visits are generally episodic and illness- or injury-related, there is no formal mechanism for follow-up, continuity of care or coordination with the patient's primary care provider. Such episodic care can raise quality issues.

The Report concludes that "the urgent care and retail provider landscape needs greater oversight and regulation to ensure that this growing service market can adequately meet the health care needs of vulnerable groups" and provides a series of recommendations. What the Report misses, however, is that these delivery sites are often the most cost-effective option for health care services, and adding additional regulatory requirements will result in increased costs, potentially decreasing accessibility for even more individuals. While the Report raises important concerns, more study is needed to determine the right balance between regulation and access.


For more Day Pitney alerts and articles related to the impact of COVID-19, as well as information from other reliable sources, please visit our COVID-19 Resource Center.

COVID-19 DISCLAIMER: As you are aware, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, things are changing quickly and the effect, enforceability and interpretation of laws may be affected by future events. The material set forth in this document is not an unequivocal statement of law, but instead represents our best interpretation of where things stand as of the date of first publication. We have not attempted to address the potential impacts of all local, state and federal orders that may have been issued in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.




Would you like to receive our Day Pitney C.H.A.T. Newsletter? Sign up here.


Recommended
Related Professionals
Parsippany, NJ
T: (973) 966 8138
Boston, MA
T: (617) 345 4872
Hartford, CT
T: (860) 275 0168
Stamford, CT
T: (203) 977 7418
Hartford, CT
New Haven, CT
T: (860) 275 0294
Stamford, CT
T: (203) 977 7368
Parsippany, NJ
T: (973) 966 8115
New York, NY
T: (212) 297 2477
Parsippany, NJ
T: (973) 966 8041
Washington, DC
T: (202) 218 3904
Parsippany, NJ
T: (973) 966 8154