Day Pitney remains committed to providing quality legal counsel, while protecting our clients and employees. For more information, please visit our COVID-19 Resource Center.
Like many Governors, Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont has responded to the COVID-19 pandemic with a series of executive orders implementing a variety of emergency measures, including prohibiting large gatherings, closing schools and nonessential businesses, and mobilizing the state's healthcare response.  One feature of these Executive Orders that many may find surprising is that the orders suspend or modify numerous statutes governing matters ranging from the patients' bill of rights to the date of the Presidential primary election to statutes of limitations to the start of fishing season.  Can the Governor do this?
There is a statute that appears to answer this question: Connecticut General Statutes § 28-9(b)(1) states that, if the Governor declares a civil preparedness or public health emergency, he "may modify or suspend in whole or in part … any statute, regulation or requirement" that he finds to be "in conflict with the efficient and expeditious execution of civil preparedness functions or the protection of the public health." But assuming it applies here, this statute simply pushes the question further back a step. The Connecticut Constitution gives the General Assembly the legislative power to enact, amend and repeal statutes. Can the Assembly instead authorize the Governor to temporarily repeal or rewrite any statute on the books because there is an emergency?
This article provides some background on § 28-9, assesses whether the Governor's executive orders comply with the statute, analyzes the constitutionality of the statute and concludes with some suggestions for addressing doubts about the statute's constitutionality.
Click here to read full white paper.
For more Day Pitney alerts and articles related to the impact of COVID-19, as well as information from other reliable sources, please visit our COVID-19 Resource Center.
COVID-19 DISCLAIMER: As you are aware, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, things are changing quickly and the effect, enforceability and interpretation of laws may be affected by future events. The material set forth in this document is not an unequivocal statement of law, but instead represents our best interpretation of where things stand as of the date of first publication. We have not attempted to address the potential impacts of all local, state and federal orders that may have been issued in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Mark Romance authored an article, "Five Tips for Representing a Non-Party Served with a Document Subpoena: Welcome to the Party?," published by the American Bar Association Section of Litigation.
Keith Bensten authored a case note, "The First Circuit's Lessons on the Implied Warranty of Merchantability, Foreseeability, and the Critical Differences Between Contract and Tort Claims," published in the Fall 2019 issue of the Federal Bar Association Massachusetts Chapter newsletter.
Mark A. Romance authored an article, "Five Tips for an Effective Mediation Statement," which was published by the American Bar Association, Section of Litigation.
Day Pitney Alert
Day Pitney Press Release
Miami-based partner Mark Romance was quoted in an article, "Civil Theft Claims Not Barred by Economic Loss Rule," which appeared in Litigation News, a publication of the American Bar Association, Section of Litigation.
Jonathan Handler is quoted in an article, "Info From Journalists Isn't 'Work Product'", published by Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly.
Day Pitney Press Release
Firm Ranked Tier 1 Nationally for Energy Law and Trusts and Estates Law
Day Pitney LLP's representation of HDI Global Insurance Co. (HDI) was noted in an article, "1st Circ. Brushes Off Dental Co.'s Insurance Claim For TM Suit," published by Law360.