On March 20, New Jersey Governor Murphy signed into law a bill amending Section 14A:5-1 of the New Jersey Business Corporation Act to permit New Jersey corporations to hold meetings of shareholders solely by means of remote communication (a virtual-only meeting) during a State of Emergency declared by the Governor. At times when New Jersey is not in a State of Emergency, New Jersey remains a "hybrid" state with respect to virtual shareholder meetings, meaning that New Jersey corporations can hold a virtual meeting only so long as there is also an actual physical location for the meeting where shareholders can attend in-person.
Section 14A:5-1 requires that any New Jersey corporation holding a virtual-only or hybrid shareholder meeting:
A New Jersey corporation must also confirm that its certificate of incorporation and by-laws do not limit or prevent it from providing for remote participation by shareholders. If any such limitations exist, the corporation may need to amend those documents before proceeding.
Although the legislation provides welcome relief to New Jersey corporations that are grappling with the evolving COVID-19 pandemic and its implications for their 2020 annual shareholder meetings, the condition that a State of Emergency be in place for a corporation to avail itself of this relief may be problematic for many New Jersey corporations, and public companies in particular. Governor Murphy declared a State of Emergency with respect to the COVID-19 pandemic on March 9, pursuant to Executive Order 103, which took effect immediately and "shall remain in effect until such time as it is determined by [the Governor] that an emergency no longer exists."
Because the ability to conduct a virtual-only shareholder meeting is in effect only so long as a State of Emergency has been declared and remains in effect in the State of New Jersey, New Jersey corporations must plan for the possibility that the State of Emergency may be lifted shortly before, or even on the day of, the shareholder meeting, in which case a physical location for the meeting would still be required. This is of particular concern to public companies, which typically file their proxy statements with the Securities and Exchange Commission and mail the notice of meeting to shareholders 30 or more days prior to the meeting date. For a New Jersey corporation that is a public company and has not yet filed its proxy statement, it would be advisable to plan for, and notice, a hybrid meeting (with both in-person and remote components) and to provide in the proxy statement for the possibility of converting to a virtual-only meeting format.
Additionally, we note that the virtual-only shareholder meeting provisions of Section 14A:5-1 are triggered when there is a State of Emergency declared in New Jersey, regardless of whether a meeting is to be held in New Jersey or at an out-of-state location. Thus, there is the possibility that a New Jersey corporation holding a meeting in a state that has declared a State of Emergency cannot hold a virtual-only meeting if there is no ongoing State of Emergency in New Jersey at that time.
Before proceeding with a virtual annual meeting, all public companies (regardless of their state of incorporation) should consult with counsel to ensure that proper procedures are followed and appropriate disclosures are made. Due to the recent influx of requests for virtual shareholder meetings in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, corporations that are considering hybrid or virtual-only shareholder meetings should reach out to their transfer agent or shareholder service company as soon as practicable to account for the additional lead-time that may be required to set up remote participation. Corporations will also need lead-time to coordinate the logistics of the virtual component of their meetings (for example, ensuring that all participants, especially those with speaking roles, are prepared to participate remotely) and to think through other necessary or appropriate changes to the meeting or its structure, such as updating annual meeting scripts, to reflect the virtual component of the meeting.
Day Pitney attorneys are available to assist should you be considering holding, or converting to, a hybrid or virtual-only shareholder meeting.
 For those corporations which have already filed/mailed their proxy materials, the SEC has issued guidance on how a company should notify its shareholders of the determination to convert its in-person meeting to a virtual meeting.
For more Day Pitney alerts and articles related to the impact of COVID-19, as well as information from other reliable sources, please visit our COVID-19 Resource Center.
COVID-19 DISCLAIMER: As you are aware, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, things are changing quickly and the effect, enforceability and interpretation of laws may be affected by future events. The material set forth in this document is not an unequivocal statement of law, but instead represents our best interpretation of where things stand as of the date of first publication. We have not attempted to address the potential impacts of all local, state and federal orders that may have been issued in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
On January 15, Brian Fischer spoke at "When Good Deals Go Bad – Pitfalls to Avoid During the Sale Process," an Exit Planning Exchange (XPX) program held at The Hartford Club in Hartford, CT.
On January 27, Michael Rave will be speaking on "Public & Private Capital Raising: How To Fund Your Bank for Growth and/or Change" at Bank Director's annual conference, Acquire or Be Acquired, in Phoenix, AZ.
On January 18, Michael Rave and Michael Dunne participated in the 2019 Economic Leadership Forum, presented by the New Jersey Bankers Association.
On October 5, partner Ellen Knarr served as a panelist at the St. John's University School of Law Women's Leadership Boot Camp, presented by the Women's Law Society.
Day Pitney Press Release
Day Pitney Press Release
Firm Ranked Tier 1 Nationally for Energy Law and Trusts and Estates Law
Day Pitney Press Release
Tom Goldberg and Scott Beach were quoted in an article, "Day Pitney Lawyers Bullish About Stamford Move," published by the Stamford Advocate.
Day Pitney represented AlphaCrest Capital Management LLC (AlphaCrest), a quantitative research and technology-driven systematic trading firm based in New York, in connection with (i) the acquisition of a minority ownership interest in AlphaCrest by Brummer & Partners, an alternative investment manager based in Sweden and (ii) an investment by Brummer's BMS Multi-Strategy fund of funds in AlphaCrest Offshore Strategies Fund Ltd., an affiliated offshore feeder fund of the investment manager.
Day Pitney Alert