On March 8, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued a revised Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification, for immediate use by employers.
By way of background, all U.S. employers are required to complete a Form I-9 for all employees hired on or after November 6, 1986. The purpose of Form I-9 is for employers to document their employees' identity and authorization to work in the United States. USCIS first introduced a revised Form I-9 almost one year ago and invited the public to comment on it. After reviewing the comments and going through several iterations, USCIS issued the revised Form I-9, bearing an edition date of March 8, 2013. Employers have a grace period of two months to continue to use the previous versions of Form I-9 bearing an edition date of either February 2, 2009, or August 7, 2009. On May 8, use of the new Form I-9 will become mandatory and employers that fail to comply may be subject to civil penalties. Accordingly, employers should incorporate the new Form I-9 edition into their compliance procedures as soon as possible, regardless of whether they complete and maintain their records manually or electronically.
Employers may find the revised form at http://www.uscis.gov/files/form/i-9.pdf.
What Is New About the Form I-9?
Form I-9 has historically been one page, with three different sections. The first section is to be completed by the new employee no earlier than his or her acceptance of an offer and no later than the first date of hire. The second section is to be completed by an authorized representative of the employer no later than three business days from the employee's date of hire, to ensure the employee has properly completed Section 1 and to verify the employee's documents evidence identity and employment eligibility. The third section is to be completed by the employer to reverify that an employee with expiring employment authorization continues to have valid employment authorization after the date of expiration, as indicated by the employee in the first section of the form.
The revisions to the Form I-9 are as follows:
1. The new form has a revised layout. It now consists of two pages (in addition to the list of acceptable documents to establish identity and employment authorization).
2. The new form contains new data fields relating to the employee, including foreign passport number and country of issuance and telephone number and e-mail address (the latter two being optional).
3. The new form provides clearer instructions regarding its completion, including:
Proper completion of Form I-9 is even more critical now that the revised version contains more explicit instructions. It remains to be seen how U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) will address violations relating to improper completion of the form and whether errors will constitute technical or substantive violations, a distinction that impacts the severity of fines imposed on employers.
Day Pitney Alert
Day Pitney Alert
Day Pitney Alert
Heather Weine Brochin and Gregory Tabakman authored an article entitled "Third Circuit Advises that Employer Must Pay Employees for Short Rest Breaks," which was published by the New Jersey Law Journal.
Day Pitney partner Francine Esposito will speak at the upcoming webinar "Workplace Leave Laws: Strategies to Navigate the Changing Landscape in the U.S." Taking place on Sept. 14 at 2 p.m., the webinar is the first in a series of webinars hosted by the Employment Law Alliance (ELA) on workplace leave laws around the globe.
John McLafferty was quoted in an article, "Employment Lawyers Leery of Bill Banning NDAs, Arbitration," published by Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly.
Heather Weine Brochin was quoted in an article, "Confidentiality Disqualifies Harassment Settlement Tax Deductions," published on the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) website.
John McLafferty was quoted in an article, "How Employers' Haunted House and Fright Night Went Way Wrong," published on the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) website.
Michael Furey was quoted in an article, "The Biggest New Jersey Cases of 2016," which was published in Law360.
Michael Furey was quoted in an article, "NJ Panel Grills Hospitals Over Discovery In Horizon Row," in Law360. Day Pitney is representing five New Jersey hospitals in a lawsuit against Horizon Healthcare, relating to its new, multi-tiered health plan called OMNIA. Furey advocated on behalf of the five hospitals on Wednesday before a New Jersey appeals court that Horizon should turn over a consultant's report and certain agreements relating to how Horizon categorized hospitals under its controversial OMNIA Alliance program and the impact of OMNIA on the hospitals. These Tier 2 hospitals are alleging various claims, including breach of contract and citing concerns that being ranked in the lower tier of the program will cost them business. Horizon contends the sought-after materials, including a financial analysis, strategic alliance agreements and rate agreements between the insurer and OMNIA network hospitals, contain trade secret and confidential information. "If we're going to prove our hospitals should be Tier 1 alliance members, we need the documents and the information," Furey said.