On December 13, 2010, New York Gov. David Paterson signed the Wage Theft Prevention Act (the "Act") enhancing the notification obligations on New York employers. This amendment to the New York Labor Law also increases the penalties associated with violations and expands the scope of retaliation claims. The Act becomes effective April 12, 2011.
New Notice and Pay Statement Obligations and Penalties
In 2009, the New York Labor Law was amended to require employers to provide new hires with written notice of the employees' pay rate(s); overtime pay rate(s), if applicable; and regular payday. Now there is more.
Notice of Wages
All New York employers must notify each employee, in writing, at the time of hire and annually (on or before February 1) of (1) the employee's rate of pay and the basis of such pay (e.g., hourly, weekly, salary, commission); (2) the overtime rate, if applicable; (3) any allowances claimed as part of the minimum wage; (4) the regular payday; (5) the name of the employer and any "doing business as" names; and (6) the address of the employer's main office or principal place of business and a phone number. This notice must be in English and the primary language of the employee. The employee must provide a signed and dated written acknowledgment of receipt of such annual notice, and the employer must retain that for six years. To the extent information in the notice changes, employers must advise employees seven days prior to the change unless the change is documented on the employee's wage statement.
In addition, with each paycheck, all New York employers must provide each employee with a wage statement that includes, among other things, the dates of work covered by the check, rate and basis of pay, gross and net wages and deductions, any allowances, and the regular hourly and overtime rate for nonexempt employees. Employers must maintain these payroll records for six years.
Under the Act, both employees and the Commissioner of Labor (the "Commissioner") can bring an action to recover specific damages plus attorneys' fees and costs against an employer who fails to provide the notice of wages or wage statement. Specifically, an employee who is not provided with a notice of wages within 10 business days of his or her first date of employment may seek $50 for each workweek he or she does not receive such notice, up to $2,500. An employee who is not provided with a wage statement may seek $100 for each workweek of such violation, up to $2,500. Notably, the Act empowers the Commissioner to recover these civil penalties without any cap.
Heightened Penalties and Powers of the Commissioner
In addition to the penalties it provides for noncompliance with the notice and wage statement requirements, the Act increases the penalties associated with other violations of the New York Labor Law and grants the Commissioner additional enforcement power. Some highlights of the Act follow:
Expanded Retaliation Claims
Employers also must beware of the newly expanded retaliation provisions under the Act that will protect not only those employees who complain about wage violations but employees who the employer believes have complained. Such complaint need not be to the employer or the Commissioner but may now be to the Attorney General or "any other person." In addition to the existing forms of retaliation, employers are now explicitly prohibited from threatening an employee who complains. The Act makes it clear that an employee need not refer to a specific provision of the law when complaining.
Repercussions for Employers
New York employers need to understand these upcoming changes and take steps to ensure that their policies and practices comply with the expanded New York Labor Law. Specifically, employers must draft compliant wage notices and statements or revise their existing documents to comply with the Act. Employers should also ensure that their human resources personnel and management employees understand the prohibition on retaliation related to employees who complain about their wages.
Day Pitney Alert
Day Pitney Alert
Day Pitney Alert
Heather Weine Brochin and Gregory Tabakman authored an article entitled "Third Circuit Advises that Employer Must Pay Employees for Short Rest Breaks," which was published by the New Jersey Law Journal.
Day Pitney partner Francine Esposito will speak at the upcoming webinar "Workplace Leave Laws: Strategies to Navigate the Changing Landscape in the U.S." Taking place on Sept. 14 at 2 p.m., the webinar is the first in a series of webinars hosted by the Employment Law Alliance (ELA) on workplace leave laws around the globe.
John McLafferty was quoted in an article, "Employment Lawyers Leery of Bill Banning NDAs, Arbitration," published by Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly.
Heather Weine Brochin was quoted in an article, "Confidentiality Disqualifies Harassment Settlement Tax Deductions," published on the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) website.
John McLafferty was quoted in an article, "How Employers' Haunted House and Fright Night Went Way Wrong," published on the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) website.
Michael Furey was quoted in an article, "The Biggest New Jersey Cases of 2016," which was published in Law360.
Michael Furey was quoted in an article, "NJ Panel Grills Hospitals Over Discovery In Horizon Row," in Law360. Day Pitney is representing five New Jersey hospitals in a lawsuit against Horizon Healthcare, relating to its new, multi-tiered health plan called OMNIA. Furey advocated on behalf of the five hospitals on Wednesday before a New Jersey appeals court that Horizon should turn over a consultant's report and certain agreements relating to how Horizon categorized hospitals under its controversial OMNIA Alliance program and the impact of OMNIA on the hospitals. These Tier 2 hospitals are alleging various claims, including breach of contract and citing concerns that being ranked in the lower tier of the program will cost them business. Horizon contends the sought-after materials, including a financial analysis, strategic alliance agreements and rate agreements between the insurer and OMNIA network hospitals, contain trade secret and confidential information. "If we're going to prove our hospitals should be Tier 1 alliance members, we need the documents and the information," Furey said.