Like many Governors, Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont has responded to the COVID-19 pandemic with a series of executive orders implementing a variety of emergency measures, including prohibiting large gatherings, closing schools and nonessential businesses, and mobilizing the state's healthcare response. [1] One feature of these Executive Orders that many may find surprising is that the orders suspend or modify numerous statutes governing matters ranging from the patients' bill of rights to the date of the Presidential primary election to statutes of limitations to the start of fishing season. [2] Can the Governor do this?
There is a statute that appears to answer this question: Connecticut General Statutes § 28-9(b)(1) states that, if the Governor declares a civil preparedness or public health emergency, he "may modify or suspend in whole or in part … any statute, regulation or requirement" that he finds to be "in conflict with the efficient and expeditious execution of civil preparedness functions or the protection of the public health." But assuming it applies here, this statute simply pushes the question further back a step. The Connecticut Constitution gives the General Assembly the legislative power to enact, amend and repeal statutes. Can the Assembly instead authorize the Governor to temporarily repeal or rewrite any statute on the books because there is an emergency?
This article provides some background on § 28-9, assesses whether the Governor's executive orders comply with the statute, analyzes the constitutionality of the statute and concludes with some suggestions for addressing doubts about the statute's constitutionality.
Click here to read full white paper.
For more Day Pitney alerts and articles related to the impact of COVID-19, as well as information from other reliable sources, please visit our COVID-19 Resource Center.
COVID-19 DISCLAIMER: As you are aware, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, things are changing quickly and the effect, enforceability and interpretation of laws may be affected by future events. The material set forth in this document is not an unequivocal statement of law, but instead represents our best interpretation of where things stand as of the date of first publication. We have not attempted to address the potential impacts of all local, state and federal orders that may have been issued in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Day Pitney Litigation Partners Jeffrey Mueller and James Rotondo were featured in the Law360 article, "Don't Trip Over These Tricky Conn. Legal Stumbling Blocks."
Day Pitney Press Release
Day Pitney Press Release
Day Pitney Partner Michael Fitzpatrick has joined the Product Liability Advisory Council's (PLAC) Future Leaders Program.
Day Pitney Press Release
Day Pitney Press Release
Day Pitney Press Release
Day Pitney Florida Litigation Partner Mark Romance was featured on the American Bar Association's Legal Talk Network's Litigation Radio Podcast titled, "How to Handle the Unexpected in Court."
Day Pitney Press Release
Attorneys Benjamin Haglund, Michael Fitzpatrick and Palak Sharma co-authored the New York and New Jersey sections of Lex Mundi's Global Attorney-Client Privilege Guide.
Copyright © 2023 Day Pitney LLP, all rights reserved.