Conn. High Court Modifies Design Defect Standards

Publisher: Law360

May 19, 2016

Day Pitney Author(s) James H. Rotondo

Jim Rotondo and Jennifer Shukla wrote an article, "Conn. High Court Modifies Design Defect Standards," for Law360. The article is about the significance of the decision in Izzarelli v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 321 Conn. 172 (2016) (officially released May 3, 2016) nicknamed by the media as the "Good Tobacco" litigation. With the decision, the Connecticut Supreme Court altered the legal landscape in Connecticut for design defect product liability claims. The authors describe the case as "Connecticut Supreme Court’s attempt at finding a middle ground in a national debate about the best standard to use in design defect product liability cases." The plaintiff sued R.J Reynolds for allegedly intentionally manipulating the additives and nicotine content in its Salem brand of cigarettes to make the cigarettes more addictive and consequently more carcinogenic and won the first trial. The case established that the modified consumer expectations test, which involves balancing several risk and utility factors and will generally require expert evidence, is the default and primary standard for design defect cases in Connecticut. The case fits squarely within a national trend of moving away from the ordinary consumer expectations test in design defect cases.

Recommended

Snapchat Case May Offer Opening For Design Defect Plaintiffs

May 28, 2021

James Rotondo and Andrew Ammirati authored a bylined article for Law360 titled, “Snapchat Case May Offer Opening For Design Defect Plaintiffs.”

"Chapter 12: Regulating Cannabis Products," Product Liability Litigation, Current Law, Strategies, and Best Practices, Second Edition

April 1, 2021

Day Pitney Partner James Rotondo, Counsel Steven Cash, and their former colleague Kaitlin Canty authored the chapter, "Regulating Cannabis Products," in the second edition of Product Liability Litigation, Current Law, Strategies, and Best Practices, published by Practicing Law Institute.

The Investigation and Enforcement Landscape Under the Garland Department of Justice

February 10, 2021

Judge Christopher Droney (ret.) and Matthew Austin co-authored the article, "The Investigation and Enforcement Landscape Under the Garland Department of Justice," for the New York Law Journal.

Joint Representations: A Blessing or a Curse?

January 11, 2021

Michael Furey authored the article, "Joint Representations: A Blessing or a Curse?" for the New Jersey Law Journal.

Remote Proceedings Update

On December 17, Judge Christopher Droney served as a panelist for the Federal Bar Council webinar, "Remote Proceedings Update."

December 17, 2020

People on the Move

October 25, 2021

Florida Partner Gary S. Betensky elected to serve as Chair of the Palm Beach County Environmental Control Hearing Board was featured in the Sun Sentinel's People on the Move Column.

Gary S. Betensky Elected as Chair of the Palm Beach County Environmental Control Hearing Board

October 13, 2021

Florida Partner Gary S. Betensky has been elected by the board members of the Palm Beach County Environmental Control Hearing Board to serve as chair, effective immediately.

Paul Williams Recognized as a Benchmark Litigation Star by Benchmark Litigation

October 5, 2021

Partner Paul D. Williams has been recognized as a Benchmark Litigation Star in the Benchmark Litigation 2022 Guide. According to Benchmark Litigation, Williams has been identified as one of the preeminent litigation practitioners in the U.S.

Mark Salah Morgan Reappointed to the New Jersey Supreme Court's Committee on Complementary Dispute Resolution

September 20, 2021

Day Pitney Press Release

Mark Romance Appointed ABA's Business Litigation Committee Co-chair

September 3, 2021

Day Pitney Litigation partner Mark Romance appointment to the ABA's Commercial and Business Litigation Committee as co-chair was featured in Intellectual Property Magazine.