Conn. High Court Modifies Design Defect Standards

Publisher: Law360

May 19, 2016

Day Pitney Author(s) James H. Rotondo

Jim Rotondo and Jennifer Shukla wrote an article, "Conn. High Court Modifies Design Defect Standards," for Law360. The article is about the significance of the decision in Izzarelli v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 321 Conn. 172 (2016) (officially released May 3, 2016) nicknamed by the media as the "Good Tobacco" litigation. With the decision, the Connecticut Supreme Court altered the legal landscape in Connecticut for design defect product liability claims. The authors describe the case as "Connecticut Supreme Court’s attempt at finding a middle ground in a national debate about the best standard to use in design defect product liability cases." The plaintiff sued R.J Reynolds for allegedly intentionally manipulating the additives and nicotine content in its Salem brand of cigarettes to make the cigarettes more addictive and consequently more carcinogenic and won the first trial. The case established that the modified consumer expectations test, which involves balancing several risk and utility factors and will generally require expert evidence, is the default and primary standard for design defect cases in Connecticut. The case fits squarely within a national trend of moving away from the ordinary consumer expectations test in design defect cases.

April 1, 2021

Day Pitney Partner James Rotondo, Counsel Steven Cash, and their former colleague Kaitlin Canty authored the chapter, "Regulating Cannabis Products," in the second edition of Product Liability Litigation, Current Law, Strategies, and Best Practices, published by Practicing Law Institute.

The Investigation and Enforcement Landscape Under the Garland Department of Justice

February 10, 2021

Judge Christopher Droney (ret.) and Matthew Austin co-authored the article, "The Investigation and Enforcement Landscape Under the Garland Department of Justice," for the New York Law Journal.

Breach of Fiduciary Duty Litigation: Superior Court Versus Probate & Family Court

On January 13, Darian Butcher will moderate and Alisa Hacker will speak at the Boston Bar Association webinar, "Breach of Fiduciary Duty Litigation: Superior Court Versus Probate & Family Court."

January 13, 2021

Joint Representations: A Blessing or a Curse?

January 11, 2021

Michael Furey authored the article, "Joint Representations: A Blessing or a Curse?" for the New Jersey Law Journal.

Remote Proceedings Update

On December 17, Judge Christopher Droney served as a panelist for the Federal Bar Council webinar, "Remote Proceedings Update."

December 17, 2020

New York Law Journal Highlights John Vukelj Joining Day Pitney in Its New York Office

March 12, 2021

John Vukelj's move to Day Pitney was featured in the New York Law Journal's "Lawyers on the Move."

This Husband-and-Wife Lawyers Just Landed 2 of the Most Powerful Jobs in Connecticut

March 4, 2021

Day Pitney Partner Stan Twardy was quoted in the Connecticut Law Tribune article, "This Husband-and-Wife Lawyers Just Landed 2 of the Most Powerful Jobs in Connecticut," regarding the Day Pitney alumna Nora Dannehy being named the Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont's General Counsel and her husband Leonard Boyle being appointed by the U.S. Department of Justice as acting U.S. Attorney in Connecticut.

Gov. Lamont Names Nora Dannehy as His General Counsel

March 3, 2021

Christopher Droney was quoted in the Connecticut Law Tribune article, "Gov. Lamont Names Nora Dannehy as His General Counsel," discussing former Day Pitney Attorney Nora Dannehy being named by CT Gov. Lamont as his General Counsel.

Darian Butcher Appointed by the Justices of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court to the Standing Committee on Lawyer Well-Being

March 3, 2021

Day Pitney Press Release

Professionally Speaking: Delivering Comprehensive Legal Services With Client-Focused Thinking®

February 25, 2021

West Palm Beach partner Tasha Dickinson was featured in a profile in the Boca Raton Observer.