On July 2, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy signed into law Public Act No. 15-196, titled "An Act Concerning Pay Equity and Fairness" (the "Act"). The Act was originally introduced by Gov. Malloy and was designed to narrow the wage gap between men and women in Connecticut's workforce by halting "pay secrecy" – a practice the Connecticut Legislature identified as "hinder[ing] pay discrimination from being pinpointed." The Act encourages wage transparency by permitting employees to voluntarily discuss their wages with other employees and/or with third parties. The Act is effective on the date it was signed by the Governor.
Prohibitions Under the Act
The Act applies to all Connecticut employers, regardless of size. Under the Act, employers shall not:
The Act defines wages as "compensation for labor or services rendered by an employee, whether the amount is determined on a time, task, piece, commission or other basis of calculation." The definition of "wages" contained in the Act mirrors the definition found throughout Connecticut wage and hour laws. See e.g., Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31-71a(3). The definition of "wages" under those laws has been interpreted broadly and generally includes nondiscretionary bonus payments, but generally does not include discretionary bonuses or severance payments.
Voluntary Disclosure
The Act provides that the disclosure of an employee's wages must be voluntary. The Act does not require any employee to disclose or discuss his or her wages, but it protects any employee who voluntarily elects to make such disclosure or inquiry of another employee. Similarly, employers are not required to disclose the amount of wages paid to an employee.
Overlap With Federal Law
Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) guarantees employees, whether unionized or not, the right to engage in "concerted activities for mutual aid or protection." The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) interprets this provision to provide two or more employees the right to discuss their pay and wages. Under Section 8 of the NLRA, employers are prohibited from "restraining" an employee's right to engage in "concerted protected activity" under Section 7, and employers also are prohibited from retaliating against employees for exercising those rights. See e.g., Alternative Energy Applications, Inc., 361 NLRB slip op. 139 (Dec. 16, 2014). Similar to this interpretation of the NLRA, the Act statutorily permits employees in Connecticut to discuss, disclose or inquire about their or other employees' wages.
Additionally, under federal laws such as the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009, employers are prohibited from engaging in discriminatory compensation practices based on gender between employees who are performing substantially similar work.
Private Right of Action
The Act provides employees in Connecticut with a private right of action. Employees may file a complaint alleging a violation of the Act in any court of competent jurisdiction. The language of the Act appears to contemplate collective or multiple-plaintiff lawsuits, as it states any action brought for violation of the Act "may be maintained . . . by any one or more employees." Employers found in violation of the Act's prohibitions may be subject to significant damages, including compensatory damages, punitive damages, attorney fees and costs, and other legal and equitable relief. Any action alleging a violation of the Act must be brought within two years of the alleged violation.
Awareness and Compliance
As noted above, the Act became effective on July 2. Employers should immediately notify their legal, human resources and supervisory personnel of the new prohibitions under the Act and review their handbooks, contracts and policies in order to ensure compliance.
For additional information regarding this Act, or if you have any questions or concerns regarding employment law issues, please feel free to contact any of the attorneys in the side bar.
Day Pitney Employment Attorneys Lindsey A. Viscomi, Daniel L. Schwartz and Glenn W. Dowd authored the article, "Connecticut Expands Employment Anti-Discrimination Protections," for CT Lawyer.
Day Pitney Alert "FTC Takes Historic Action Against The Enforcement of Non-Compete Agreements," was featured in the Inside Radio article, "Business Begins Angling To Scale Back FTC's Proposed Limits on Noncompete Agreements."
Chair of Day Pitney's Employment and Labor Practice Heather Weine Brochin was featured in the U.S. News & World Report article, "Should You Work 2 Remote Jobs at Once?"
Day Pitney Employment and Labor Partner Daniel Schwartz was featured in Law360 Employment Authority's article, "4 Vacation Time Tips For Employers As Year Winds Down."
Chair of Day Pitney's Employment and Labor Practice Heather Brochin and Senior Associate Jim Leva authored an article titled, "New Jersey Takes Aim at Restrictive Covenants," for the New Jersey Law Journal's Employment Law Special Section.
Rod Rodriguez and Glenn Dowd authored an article on "Minimizing litigation risk on compensation disclosure" in the July 1 edition of The Hartford Business Journal.
Day Pitney Employment and Labor Partner Rachel Gonzalez was featured in the New Jersey Law Journal’s After Hours column for being a recipient of the Executive Women of New Jersey Salute to the Policy Makers Award.
Day Pitney Employment and Labor Partner Rachel Gonzalez was featured in the Diverse Lawyers Network newsletter for being a recipient of the Executive Women of New Jersey Salute to the Policy Makers Award.
Day Pitney Press Release
Day Pitney Attorneys Daniel Schwartz, Michael Lane and Lindsey Viscomi authored the article, "Don't Be Late Paying Terminated Employees in Massachusetts," for Law360 Employment Authority.
Copyright © 2023 Day Pitney LLP, all rights reserved.