On April 17, 2012, the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") announced it will postpone the effective date of its rule requiring employers to post a notice advising employees of their rights under the National Labor Relations Act ("Act") pending resolution of two court cases.
NLRB Chairman Mark Gaston Pearce issued the announcement in the wake of both the April 17, 2012 emergency injunction halting the NLRB from implementing the rule until the case pending before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia is resolved, and the April 13, 2012 decision by the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina that invalidated the rule. The South Carolina District Court specifically found that "such a rule is inconsistent with the Board's reactive role under the Act" and that the NLRB does not have the authority to issue the notice-posting rule.
The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia previously upheld the rule, but invalidated its primary enforcement mechanisms and struck down a request for an injunction. Employer groups appealed and the DC Circuit Court of Appeals granted the injunction in light of the DC District Court's ruling that invalidated the primary enforcement mechanisms for violating the posting requirement, the NLRB's indication that it may cross-appeal that portion of the decision and the need to consider the merits of the challenges to the rule before it went into effect.
These decisions are a victory for employers. However, the fight over whether the NLRB can require employers to post notices advising employees of their rights under the Act is not over. Chairman Pearce announced, "We continue to believe that requiring employers to post this notice is well within the Board's authority and that it provides a genuine service to employees who may not otherwise know their rights under our law." We expect the NLRB to appeal the South Carolina District Court decision to the Fourth Circuit. If the decisions of the DC Circuit and the Fourth Circuit conflict, it is likely that the matter will be appealed to the Supreme Court. It is important to note that this deferral does not affect the Department of Labor's current requirement that federal contractors and subcontractors post a similar notice.
Day Pitney Alert
Day Pitney Alert
Day Pitney Alert
Heather Weine Brochin and Gregory Tabakman authored an article entitled "Third Circuit Advises that Employer Must Pay Employees for Short Rest Breaks," which was published by the New Jersey Law Journal.
Day Pitney partner Francine Esposito will speak at the upcoming webinar "Workplace Leave Laws: Strategies to Navigate the Changing Landscape in the U.S." Taking place on Sept. 14 at 2 p.m., the webinar is the first in a series of webinars hosted by the Employment Law Alliance (ELA) on workplace leave laws around the globe.
John McLafferty was quoted in an article, "Employment Lawyers Leery of Bill Banning NDAs, Arbitration," published by Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly.
Heather Weine Brochin was quoted in an article, "Confidentiality Disqualifies Harassment Settlement Tax Deductions," published on the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) website.
John McLafferty was quoted in an article, "How Employers' Haunted House and Fright Night Went Way Wrong," published on the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) website.
Michael Furey was quoted in an article, "The Biggest New Jersey Cases of 2016," which was published in Law360.
Michael Furey was quoted in an article, "NJ Panel Grills Hospitals Over Discovery In Horizon Row," in Law360. Day Pitney is representing five New Jersey hospitals in a lawsuit against Horizon Healthcare, relating to its new, multi-tiered health plan called OMNIA. Furey advocated on behalf of the five hospitals on Wednesday before a New Jersey appeals court that Horizon should turn over a consultant's report and certain agreements relating to how Horizon categorized hospitals under its controversial OMNIA Alliance program and the impact of OMNIA on the hospitals. These Tier 2 hospitals are alleging various claims, including breach of contract and citing concerns that being ranked in the lower tier of the program will cost them business. Horizon contends the sought-after materials, including a financial analysis, strategic alliance agreements and rate agreements between the insurer and OMNIA network hospitals, contain trade secret and confidential information. "If we're going to prove our hospitals should be Tier 1 alliance members, we need the documents and the information," Furey said.