NJ Supreme Court Clarifies Investor Rights in Tax Sale
On November 17, the New Jersey Supreme Court in Green Knight Capital, LLC v. Calderon clarified the rights and applicable procedure for an investor to redeem a tax sale certificate. The court held that an investor otherwise qualifying to redeem a tax sale certificate may intervene in a pending foreclosure matter at any time prior to the final judgment of foreclosure. The court further found that an investor could seek to redeem a tax sale certificate prior to intervening in the foreclosure matter and that failure to intervene first would not bar the investor from redeeming the tax sale certificate. The court reiterated, however, that the appropriate procedure is for the investor to move for and obtain intervention before making any attempt to redeem the tax sale certificate. Prior to that clarification, the Supreme Court, in Simon v. Cronecker, 189 N.J. 304 (2007), held that a late arriving investor must first intervene in a tax foreclosure action before being allowed to redeem and that an investor's failure to do so rendered a pre-intervention redemption or attempted redemption invalid. Under the Tax Sale Law (N.J.S.A. 54:5-98), a redemption is permitted only by someone who has been "admitted as a party to [the tax foreclosure] action."
In Green Knight, the investor, 133 73rd Street Apt., LLC, contracted with the property owner to purchase the subject property for $100,000 after the tax foreclosure action had been initiated but before the tax sale certificate holder sought an order setting the time, place and amount of the redemption or obtained final judgment. On the closing date, the settlement agent forwarded $21,612.72 to the tax collector to redeem the tax sale certificate. Thereafter, the tax sale certificate purchaser moved in the tax foreclosure action for an order barring the investor from redeeming. The investor then cross-moved for intervention and permission to redeem.
New Jersey's Tax Sale Law (N.J.S.A. 54:5-89.1) prohibits redemption whenever a third party acquires an interest in the property for "less than fair market value" consideration after the filing of the foreclosure complaint. In its prior decision in Cronecker, the Supreme Court interpreted the Tax Sale Law (in effect at that time) as not barring "third-party investors from helping property owners in desperate need of financial assistance, but rather to ensure that the third-party investors do not exploit vulnerable owners by offering only nominal consideration for their property rights." The Supreme Court in Green Knight noted that the Tax Sale Law (N.J.S.A. 54:5-3) is "remedial" in nature and should be "liberally" construed and that one of those remedial objects is the "recognition of an owner's right to rescue some part of its property interest in the face of an impending foreclosure by contracting with an investor…" Hence, the theory that "there may be no forgiveness for an investor's mistaken or premature attempt to redeem ... stands in stark contrast to the law's evolving attitude toward late investors and its greater interest in providing property owners with the opportunity to salvage or maximize their interests before foreclosure." In short, an investor's entitlement to redeem is not forfeited because it failed to move to intervene prior to attempting redemption of the tax sale certificate, provided the investor meets the statutory prerequisite, inter alia, of a fair market value acquisition.
Recommended
Day Pitney Litigation Department Chair Manuel Garcia-Linares was featured in the Daily Business Review article, "Florida Supreme Court Clarifies Qualifications for Court – Appointed Arbitrators." Garcia
Day Pitney Press Release
Katharine A. Coffey, a Real Estate Partner, has a new leadership post after being tapped as vice chair of the firm's corporate and business law department.
Day Pitney Litigation Partner Mark Romance co-authored the article, "Tips for Navigating First-Time Trial Preparation," for the ABA Litigation Section Newsletter.
Dina Kapur Sanna, Carl Merino and Sarah Jacobson co-authored a 2024 update to the white paper, entitled "U.S. Tax Planning for Non-U.S. Persons, Assets and Trusts - An Introductory Outline."
Day Pitney continued its recent growth in its tax practice in Connecticut with the addition of Amy Drais, an experienced tax attorney from Thomson Reuters. Her arrival was featured in Law360 Pulse.
The arrival of Tax Partner Amy Drais to Day Pitney was featured in the Connecticut Law Tribune article, "Day Pitney Welcomes Tax Partner Amy Drais." Drais joined the firm in Stamford and was previously with Thomson Reuters.
The arrival of Tax Partner Amy Drais to Day Pitney was featured in Bloomberg Law's Daily Tax Report. Drais advises fund managers, investment funds, and fund investors on partnership tax matters in connection with fund formation, management structures, and structuring for investments.
The arrival of Tax Partner Ryan Leichsenring was featured in Law360 Pulse article "Day Pitney Adds Tax Partner From Robinson & Cole in Conn."