T&E Litigation Update: Savage v. Oliszczak
In Savage v. Oliszczak, Case No. 09-P-513 (June 29, 2010), the Appeals Courts again addressed the enforceability of an in terrorem clause.
The decedent executed a will and trust, with the will designating the trust as the sole devisee of the decedent's estate.? The will did not include an in terrorem clause, but the trust did include such a clause, reading as follows:? "If any person, including a beneficiary, other than me, shall in any manner, directly or indirectly, attempt to contest or oppose the validity of this agreement, including any amendments thereto, or commences or prosecutes any legal proceedings to set this instruments aside, then in such event such person shall forfeit his or her share, cease to have any right or interest in the trust property, and shall be deemed to have predeceased me."
The named executors filed a petition to probate the will.? The defendants objected to the allowance of the will on capacity and undue influence grounds, and then withdrew their objection.? The plaintiff trustees subsequently brought the present action, seeking instruction on whether the defendants' challenge to the will triggered the in terrorem clause of the trust.? The probate court held that it did not, and the Appeals Court affirmed.?
While the Appeals Court acknowledged that in terrorem clauses in wills are valid, it reasoned that the in terrorem clause of the trust was not triggered by the challenge to the decedent's will.? The Court rejected the plaintiffs' argument that the will and trust should be read together as inextricably intertwined elements of the decedent's estate plan.? Although the Court acknowledged that it will generally review separate components of an estate plan as parts of an interrelated whole, it was not persuaded to conclude that the challenge to the will operated to implicate the trust's in terrorem clause.
The Court pointed out that the trust could have been funded during the decedent's lifetime from any number of sources wholly independent of the will.? The Court also pointed out that the purpose of an in terrorem clause is to deter challenges to a will, with potential challengers being put on notice of the in terrorem clause upon the filing of the will for probate, whereas there can be no similar deterrent value to an in terrorem clause in a trust that is not made public.? On this point the Court explained that "it would be draconian to invoke a forfeiture clause against beneficiaries who challenge a will that does not contain an in terrorem clause, based on the inclusion of such a provision in a separate but undisclosed instrument."? In this context the Court also observed that in terrorem clauses have been construed narrowly because equity does not favor forfeitures.
Recommended
Day Pitney Press Release
Day Pitney Miami Partners Melissa A. Rodriguez and Mark A. Romance authored the article "Tradition vs. Technology: Original Paper Wills Are Still Required," for the Daily Business Review.
Day Pitney Litigation Partner Mark Romance co-authored the article, "Tips for Navigating First-Time Trial Preparation," for the ABA Litigation Section Newsletter.
Boston partner Hether Cahill will be a faculty member during the upcoming Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education (MCLE) “Taking Depositions Interactive Workshop 2024,” including presenting specifically on the topic “Using Demonstratives,” on October 18.
Day Pitney Press Release
Day Pitney's Fiduciary and Probate Litigation team in Boston authored several chapters in the 6th edition of Fiduciary Litigation in the Probate Court, published by Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education (MCLE).
Day Pitney Trusts and Estates Partner Christine Fletcher authored an article for Forbes.com titled, "Why Skipping Probate Could Save Time and Money." The article discusses the many reasons to avoid probate when planning for your estate.
Day Pitney Florida Offices Managing Partner Manuel Garcia-Linares has been appointed to chair the firm's Litigation department. The news was featured in the Florida Bar News.
Day Pitney Fiduciary and Probate Litigation Partner Ann Hetherwick "Hether" Cahill was featured in Super Lawyers Magazine article "The Boston Marathon: Philanthropy, a Dare, and a Fellini."
Day Pitney Florida Offices Managing Partner Manuel Garcia-Linares has been appointed to chair the firm's Litigation department. The news was featured in Miami Today.