On October 31, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued Notice 2013-71, which modifies the "use it or lose it" rule for health flexible spending account plans (Health FSAs) by providing a carryover option for unused amounts remaining at the end of a plan year. Under this carryover option, cafeteria plans that provide a Health FSA may be amended to allow up to $500 of unused amounts remaining at the end of a plan year to be paid from the Health FSA for qualified medical expenses incurred in the following plan year. In addition, Notice 2013-71 expands the transition relief for non-calendar cafeteria plan years by permitting midyear changes in salary reduction elections attributable to a participant's purchase of health coverage through an Affordable Insurance Exchange established under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (the Affordable Care Act).
The Use-It-or-Lose-It Rule
Under the current cafeteria plan rules, participants are generally prohibited from using contributions made in one plan year to purchase a benefit that will be provided in a subsequent plan year. Accordingly, amounts credited to a Health FSA that remain unused at the end of a plan year are generally forfeited. This is commonly referred to as the "use it or lose it" rule. The IRS previously modified this rule by providing a grace period, which allows a plan to permit participants to use amounts remaining from the previous year to pay for qualified medical expenses incurred within the first 2 ½ months of the following plan year (i.e., by March 15 for calendar year plans). The Affordable Care Act limited the amount that participants could contribute to their Health FSAs to $2,500 per taxable year (as indexed for cost-of-living adjustments). In light of this annual limit imposed by the Affordable Care Act, the Department of the Treasury and the IRS issued Notice 2012-40, in which they solicited public comments addressing whether the use-it-or-lose-it rule should be modified to provide a different form of administrative relief (e.g., instead of, or in addition to, the 2 ½-month grace period). Notice 2013-71 was issued in response to these public comments.
Modification of Use-It-or-Lose-It Rule
Effective immediately, employers may amend their cafeteria plan to provide for a carryover of up to $500 to the immediately following plan year of any amounts remaining in a Health FSA. The $500 carryover can be used to pay or reimburse medical expenses under the Health FSA incurred during the entire subsequent plan year (i.e., it extends beyond the current 2 ½-month grace period). Some of the highlights of the carryover option are as follows:
An employer must amend its cafeteria plan to take advantage of the carryover option. Generally, any amendments must be made no later than the last day of a plan year in which the carryover will apply. However, Notice 2013-71 provides an extended amendment period to the end of the 2014 plan year for a carryover amendment being adopted for the 2013 plan year. Employees must be provided with notice of the employer's adoption of the carryover amendment.
One question that Notice 2013-71 does not address is how the carryover would impact the ability of participants to contribute to their health savings accounts (HSAs) in years in which the carryover is available. In general, participants who are covered by a general-purpose Health FSA are prohibited from contributing to an HSA. We are hopeful the IRS will quickly issue additional guidance addressing this question.
Action Steps for Employers
Because this guidance offers employers a choice, employers should do the following:
Clarification of Cafeteria Elections and Affordable Insurance Exchanges
Generally, salary reduction elections under a cafeteria plan must be made before the beginning of the plan year and are irrevocable during the plan year, with limited exceptions (such as change in status events). Under existing cafeteria plan rules, obtaining health plan coverage through an Affordable Insurance Exchange would not constitute a change in status, and therefore employees would not be able to cease their cafeteria plan coverage. The Department of the Treasury and the IRS previously addressed this issue in the preamble to proposed regulations setting forth the employer shared responsibility rules, commonly referred to as the employer mandate provisions or pay or play rules. These rules apply to "applicable large employers" (i.e., generally employers that employ an average of at least 50 full-time employees). Specifically, the preamble permits an employer to amend its non-calendar year cafeteria plan for 2013 to allow employees to make either or both of the following changes to their salary reduction elections:
In Notice 2013-71, the IRS clarified that the transition relief described above is available to all employers with a non-calendar year cafeteria plan, not just those that are considered to be "applicable large employers." Additionally, Notice 2013-71 clarifies that employers may impose more restrictive rules than what the notice allows, including permitting employees to prospectively revoke their salary reduction elections only during a limited number of months in a plan year. Employers wishing to provide this transition relief must adopt plan amendments by December 31, 2014.
Theresa Kelly and Howard Fetner wrote an article, "AARP Lawsuit Puts EEOC In An Awkward Position," for Law360.
Day Pitney Alert
Day Pitney Alert
Rachel Gonzalez, Mary Rogers and Patrick McCarthy wrote an article "NLRB Eases Organizing of Temporary Workers" for CBIA’s H&R Safety Newsletter on the impact of the recent decision of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).
Kathy Lawler and Ajay Gogna wrote an article, "Employer Wellness Programs: A Look At The New Rules," for Law360. The article analyzes and offers best practices for employers to comply with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s final regulation under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act and Title II of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) as they relate to employer wellness programs.
James Leva was quoted in an article, "CT gets on board with e-pay cards," in The Hartford Business Journal.
James Leva was quoted in an article, "New payday option in Conn. — put it on plastic," in The Stamford Advocate.
David Doyle was quoted in an article, "Numbers and High Stakes for Executive Compensation Lawyers," in The New Jersey Law Journal. The article is about the important role executive compensation lawyers play in the boardroom, especially in the midst of pending changes to federal regulation in the financial industry and publicized pay jumps.
David Doyle was quoted in an article, "Independent researchers seen easing DOL fiduciary burden for brokers," in InvestmentNews.
John McLafferty was quoted in an article,"New pay equity law offers fertile ground for litigation," in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly.