On April 25, 2012, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") voted 4-1 to approve an updated Enforcement Guidance titled "Consideration of Arrest and Conviction Records in Employment Decisions Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964." The EEOC also issued a related Questions and Answers document. The newly issued guidance expands on Title VII guidance the EEOC issued more than 20 years ago.
According to the EEOC, the new guidance is predicated on and supported by federal court precedent concerning the application of Title VII to employer consideration of a job applicant's or employee's criminal history and incorporates judicial decisions issued since the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1991. The guidance also updates relevant data and consolidates previous EEOC policy statements on the use of criminal history information. The EEOC includes in the guidance examples of steps employers can take to comply with Title VII when making employment decisions based on criminal history. The guidance concludes with recommended "best practices" for employers.
The enforcement guidance generally discusses liability based on disparate treatment, but it focuses on disparate impact liability. According to national criminal history data on which the EEOC relied in drafting the guidance, criminal background-checking policies have a disproportionate effect on racial and ethnic minorities. The national data provides the EEOC with a basis for investigating Title VII disparate impact charges challenging adverse actions based on criminal records.
The enforcement guidance:
Though the enforcement guidance is not binding on employers, it is nevertheless important for employers to examine their policies regarding background checks and applicants' or employees' criminal history because the EEOC will consider the document when enforcing Title VII. Further, although the guidance does not prohibit employers from asking about convictions on job applications or require that employers provide an "individualized assessment" for candidates screened out by a background check, the EEOC will look to see whether employers have these policies in place when investigating a charge challenging an adverse action based on criminal history. When reviewing their policies, employers must also consider risks beyond noncompliance with Title VII, such as liability based on negligent hiring.
If you have any questions associated with this guidance, please contact a member of the firm's Labor and Employment group.
Basil Sitaras, Daniel Schwartz and Patrick McCarthy co-wrote an article, "NLRB Again Invalidates Arbitration Agreements," for Law360. The article analyzes the decision in in Acevedo v. Amex Card Servs. Co., Case No. 28-CA-123865, in which the National Labor Relations Board held that arbitration agreements that include class action waivers are illegal and unenforceable under the National Labor Relations Act.
Mary Rogers and Mike Dell wrote an article, The Curious Case Of 'Borgata Babes',” for Law360. The article focuses on a decision in a lawsuit filed against the Borgata related to appearance standards that were required for both male and female employees who worked in certain areas of the casino. The decision is significant because it upholds the right of New Jersey employers to impose reasonable appearance, grooming and dress standards as long as they are applied in a nondiscriminatory manner and are consistent with the nature of the business.
Eric Sussman, Dan Schwartz and James Leva wrote the article, "Connecticut Enacts Employee Online Privacy Law," in the Employee Relations Law Journal. The article examines Public Act No. 15-6, which Gov. Dannel P. Malloy signed into law in May. The act prohibits employers from seeking access to employees' personal online accounts. In the article, the authors outline best practices for permissible investigations.
Dan Schwartz and James Leva wrote the article, "Shedding Light On Conn.'s Pay Secrecy Law" for Law360. The article discusses Public Act No. 15-196, "An Act Concerning Pay Equity and Fairness," which was signed into law in early July by Connecticut Gov. Dannel P. Malloy. The law was originally introduced to narrow the wage gap between men and women in Connecticut's workforce by halting "pay secrecy," a practice the Connecticut Legislature identified as "hinder[ing] pay discrimination from being pinpointed." The law encourages wage transparency by permitting employees to voluntarily discuss their wages with other employees and/or with third parties.
John DeSimone was mentioned in an article, “Executive Moves: Who hired whom this week,” in NJBIZ. DeSimone recently joined Day Pitney’s real estate and litigation practices from Porzio. He joined the firm with colleagues Peter Wolfson, Katharine Coffey, Douglas Henshaw and Catherine Nolan
The Day Pitney alert, "Federal Contractors Must Provide Paid Sick Time in the Future," authored by Francine Esposito and Arielle B. Sepulveda was referenced in a Staffing Industry Analysts article, "New Bill Would 'Ban the Box' for Federal Contractors." In addition to the Fair Chance Act, the article discusses the executive order signed by President Obama that requires federal contractors to provide paid sick time leave. Esposito and Sepulveda noted that the requirement applies to all federal contracts awarded on or after January 1, 2017.
Gregory Parliman was quoted in the article, "5 Dos And Don'ts For Employers After NJ's Ethicon Ruling," in Law360. The article discusses impact of the recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision, which found the state's whistleblower law covers watchdog employees in performing their regular duties, and Parliman offered some best practices for employers in light of the decision.
Al Zakarian was mentioned in the article, "Day Pitney Partner Receives CT Bar Assoc. Edward F. Hennessey Professionalism Award," in the Hartford Business Journal. Zakarian was recently presented with the Edward F. Hennessey Professionalism Award during the CBA Annual Luncheon Meeting as part of the Connecticut Legal Conference.
Stamford, Conn., August 24, 2015 - Day Pitney is pleased to announce that 68 attorneys have been selected for inclusion in the 2016 Best Lawyers in America. Best Lawyers ranks lawyers through peer-review surveys, and has been published annually since 1983.