In both its written materials and oral presentations outlining changes to its tax-exempt bond compliance program, the Tax-Exempt Bonds ("TEB") group of the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") recently reconfirmed the importance of municipal issuers having written post-issuance compliance procedures with respect to their tax-exempt bond issues.
A detailed description of the requirements for tax-exempt bond post-issuance compliance and the parameters of the Voluntary Closing Agreement Program ("VCAP") may be found at www.irs.gov/bonds under "TEB Post-Issuance Compliance" and "TEB Voluntary Compliance," which also contain extensive cross-links to relevant sections of the Internal Revenue Manual, IRS Notices and Rulings, articles, and other educational materials. This Alert provides an overview of key concepts presented in these materials.
Emphasis on Voluntary Compliance and Dispute Resolution
The continued tax-exempt status of bonds or receipt of subsidy payments for direct-pay tax-credit bonds (such as Build America Bonds) requires issuers to maintain ongoing compliance with tax covenants contained in the bond documents. The IRS expects issuers to monitor compliance and prefers that they take "self-correction" remedial actions when noncompliance is uncovered. If a remedial action is not available, the IRS prefers that issuers use the VCAP program. The IRS has stated that an issuer will receive more favorable treatment of its matter under the VCAP program than it would under an audit examination of the same noncompliance matter.
Heightened Emphasis on Written Post-Issuance Compliance Procedures
Recent modifications to the standards for dispute resolution contained in the Internal Revenue Manual also provide incentives for issuers to adopt and use written procedures to monitor post-issuance compliance as part of their ongoing operations. The IRS has stated that issuers that timely identify violations pursuant to their written post-issuance compliance procedures and that timely submit a VCAP request will be subject to a reduced settlement amount. The IRS has identified that written procedures should include the following:
We also call to your attention that the IRS has recently amended certain versions of Form 8038 to include a question asking whether the issuer has adopted written post-issuance compliance procedures. While we cannot predict with certainty, it is our expectation that the IRS will move toward including such a question in all versions of Form 8038. We note that the IRS uses 8038 forms to identify bond issues to be audited.
The Day Pitney municipal finance attorneys listed to the right of this Alert are available to assist you in understanding the impact of these new guidelines, and in drafting and implementing such written procedures. Please feel free to call on us. We also encourage you to visit the above-listed website.
Day Pitney Alert
Joy Harmon Sperling and Rachel Packer wrote an article, "No Such Thing As A Free House? NJ Court Says Otherwise," for Law360. The article examines a recent unpublished opinion rendered by the Superior Court of New Jersey, Bergen County in Anim Investment Co. v. Shaloub, No. F-30508-15, 2015 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 3042 (Ch. Div. June 30, 2016).
Day Pitney Advisory
Judith Blank and Kristin Burgess authored the article, "Anti-discrimination rules for contractors expanded," for the Fairfield County Business Journal. The article discusses best practices for the recent changes in the state's nondiscrimination, affirmative action and supplier diversity program, and how statutes will be extended to municipalities and quasi-public agencies pursuant to recent legislation starting on October first.
Day Pitney LLP has once again been recognized as Connecticut's number one bond counsel firm by volume, serving as bond counsel on issues in Connecticut totaling approximately $1.7 billion in 2016, according to The Bond Buyer, a daily newspaper serving the municipal bond industry.
Day Pitney Press Release
Hartford, Conn., May 26, 2016 - Day Pitney LLP represented the State of Connecticut as lead bond counsel and disclosure counsel in a general obligation refunding bond sale of $501.4 million. The sale resulted in saving of $75.5 million in debt service costs over the life of the refinanced bonds. The Nappier administration has an active debt refunding program which has saved taxpayers $1.1 billion to date.
Hartford, CT, March 23, 2016 - Day Pitney LLP represented the State of Connecticut as disclosure counsel in a general obligation bond sale of $550 million.
Day Pitney was mentioned in an article, “Green Bonds Feature in Coming Connecticut GO Sale,” in The Bond Buyer. The firm was mentioned as lead bond counsel and lead disclosure counsel for the State of Connecticut’s sale of $650 million general obligation bond sale that includes a $65 million green-bond series. Day Pitney partners Namita Tripathi Shah, Judith Blank and Douglas Gillette are advising on the transaction, along with counsel Glenn Rybacki