On December 13, 2010, New York Gov. David Paterson signed the Wage Theft Prevention Act (the "Act") enhancing the notification obligations on New York employers. This amendment to the New York Labor Law also increases the penalties associated with violations and expands the scope of retaliation claims. The Act becomes effective April 12, 2011.
New Notice and Pay Statement Obligations and Penalties
In 2009, the New York Labor Law was amended to require employers to provide new hires with written notice of the employees' pay rate(s); overtime pay rate(s), if applicable; and regular payday. Now there is more.
Notice of Wages
All New York employers must notify each employee, in writing, at the time of hire and annually (on or before February 1) of (1) the employee's rate of pay and the basis of such pay (e.g., hourly, weekly, salary, commission); (2) the overtime rate, if applicable; (3) any allowances claimed as part of the minimum wage; (4) the regular payday; (5) the name of the employer and any "doing business as" names; and (6) the address of the employer's main office or principal place of business and a phone number. This notice must be in English and the primary language of the employee. The employee must provide a signed and dated written acknowledgment of receipt of such annual notice, and the employer must retain that for six years. To the extent information in the notice changes, employers must advise employees seven days prior to the change unless the change is documented on the employee's wage statement.
In addition, with each paycheck, all New York employers must provide each employee with a wage statement that includes, among other things, the dates of work covered by the check, rate and basis of pay, gross and net wages and deductions, any allowances, and the regular hourly and overtime rate for nonexempt employees. Employers must maintain these payroll records for six years.
Under the Act, both employees and the Commissioner of Labor (the "Commissioner") can bring an action to recover specific damages plus attorneys' fees and costs against an employer who fails to provide the notice of wages or wage statement. Specifically, an employee who is not provided with a notice of wages within 10 business days of his or her first date of employment may seek $50 for each workweek he or she does not receive such notice, up to $2,500. An employee who is not provided with a wage statement may seek $100 for each workweek of such violation, up to $2,500. Notably, the Act empowers the Commissioner to recover these civil penalties without any cap.
Heightened Penalties and Powers of the Commissioner
In addition to the penalties it provides for noncompliance with the notice and wage statement requirements, the Act increases the penalties associated with other violations of the New York Labor Law and grants the Commissioner additional enforcement power. Some highlights of the Act follow:
Expanded Retaliation Claims
Employers also must beware of the newly expanded retaliation provisions under the Act that will protect not only those employees who complain about wage violations but employees who the employer believes have complained. Such complaint need not be to the employer or the Commissioner but may now be to the Attorney General or "any other person." In addition to the existing forms of retaliation, employers are now explicitly prohibited from threatening an employee who complains. The Act makes it clear that an employee need not refer to a specific provision of the law when complaining.
Repercussions for Employers
New York employers need to understand these upcoming changes and take steps to ensure that their policies and practices comply with the expanded New York Labor Law. Specifically, employers must draft compliant wage notices and statements or revise their existing documents to comply with the Act. Employers should also ensure that their human resources personnel and management employees understand the prohibition on retaliation related to employees who complain about their wages.
On January 17, John DeSimone and Heather Weine Brochin presented a discussion about employment agreements and negotiation strategies at the NYU School of Medicine.
On October 10, James Bowers will share his personal perspectives on the History of Slavery and Race in South Carolina at UConn School of Law.
Day Pitney Alert
Rachel Gonzalez, Mary Rogers and Patrick McCarthy wrote an article "NLRB Eases Organizing of Temporary Workers" for CBIA’s H&R Safety Newsletter on the impact of the recent decision of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).
Dan Schwartz and James Leva wrote an article, "Where New Conn. Ban-The-Box Law May Be Headed," for Law360. The article outlines what employers need to know about Connecticut's recently enacted "ban-the-box" law, titled "An Act Concerning Fair Chance Employment."
Michael Furey was quoted in an article, "The Biggest New Jersey Cases of 2016," which was published in Law360.
Michael Furey was quoted in an article, "NJ Panel Grills Hospitals Over Discovery In Horizon Row," in Law360. Day Pitney is representing five New Jersey hospitals in a lawsuit against Horizon Healthcare, relating to its new, multi-tiered health plan called OMNIA. Furey advocated on behalf of the five hospitals on Wednesday before a New Jersey appeals court that Horizon should turn over a consultant's report and certain agreements relating to how Horizon categorized hospitals under its controversial OMNIA Alliance program and the impact of OMNIA on the hospitals. These Tier 2 hospitals are alleging various claims, including breach of contract and citing concerns that being ranked in the lower tier of the program will cost them business. Horizon contends the sought-after materials, including a financial analysis, strategic alliance agreements and rate agreements between the insurer and OMNIA network hospitals, contain trade secret and confidential information. "If we're going to prove our hospitals should be Tier 1 alliance members, we need the documents and the information," Furey said.
Hartford, Conn., May 26, 2016 - Day Pitney LLP is pleased to announce that Employment and Labor attorney Albert Zakarian has been chosen as a Lifetime Achievement winner of The Connecticut Law Tribune’s second annual Professional Excellence Awards 2016. The Professional Excellence Awards 2016 recognize 28 lawyers, who were chosen from over 60 nominees, as either Lawyer of the Year or Lifetime Achievement recipients, according to The Connecticut Law Tribune. The Lifetime Achievement Awards honor "attorneys who have excelled over a career."
John McLafferty was quoted in an article, "Final overtime regulations less drastic than feared," in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly. In the article, McLafferty discusses how the Department of Labor’s final revised federal overtime regulation will impact businesses. "The reality is that the rule made more people eligible for overtime; it didn’t create any obligation for employers to pay more overtime," he said. McLafferty added that the regulation’s impact on employees could have a wider effect on office culture and policies, which may affect a company’s ability to attract and retain workers. In addition, he noted that employers should take this opportunity to ensure that all of their employees are properly classified for overtime purposes.
Albert Zakarian has been chosen as a winner of The Connecticut Law Tribune's second annual Professional Excellence Awards. The awards recognize two dozen lawyers for outstanding service to the profession during their long careers. The publication received more than 70 nominations. Profiles of awardees will appear in the Law Tribune in May. An event will also be held in May to recognize the winners. More about the awards can be found here.