Fitch Ratings and Moody's Investors Service each recently announced a recalibration of municipal finance credit ratings in an effort to enhance the comparability of ratings across municipal and non-municipal sectors. We alert municipal issuers of the need to determine whether these rating changes require them to file material event notices with the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board's EMMA system pursuant to their bond and note continuing disclosure agreements.
The recalibrations will result, generally, in state and local government general obligation ratings moving up one to two notches. Special tax-based bonds and other credits are expected to see less movement. Moody's points out that certain municipal ratings may not change, including ratings on housing, healthcare and other enterprise bonds, as well as short-term ratings, which Moody's already determined to be aligned with short-term ratings in other sectors.
Fitch and Moody's both indicate that their respective recalibrations are not upgrades and should not be interpreted as an improvement in the rating or in the agency's opinion of the credit quality of the underlying security. Instead, Fitch and Moody's say that these rating changes are "revision ratings" or "adjustments" to facilitate a comparison of the level of credit risk across other sectors.
Fitch expects that its "rating watches" and "rating outlooks" will be carried over post-recalibration. Moody's, on the other hand, has stated that it will update its "rating outlook," if any, for a credit when its rating is recalibrated, but ratings that were under review for upgrade or downgrade before the recalibration will remain under review after.
Fitch's state ratings were already recalibrated. Recalibrations in all the other affected sectors (local general obligation ratings, special tax-based ratings, water/sewer and public power ratings, and public higher education ratings) are projected to be implemented on April 30 and to be available at www.fitchratings.com.
Moody's has also already recalibrated its state ratings, with recalibration of local government ratings to be done in stages and an expected completion date in mid-May. Moody's ratings of local governments in Connecticut are projected to be recalibrated starting on May 3 and to be available at www.moodys.com.
It is important that issuers monitor these changes, as both Moody's and Fitch have indicated that they will not be separately notifying an issuer of recalibrations affecting its credits.
What Does This Mean for Municipal Bond and Note Issuers?
All issuers should consult their continuing disclosure undertaking to determine if these rating recalibrations require the filing of a material event notice with the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board's EMMA system at www.emma.msrb.org. This is the same system used for the annual filing of financial statements and operating data as required under bond and note continuing disclosure agreements.
The SEC's municipal disclosure rule, Rule 15c2-12, requires that a material event notice be timely filed upon a rating change if that change is material. This leaves each issuer to determine if such an event is material. In doing so, issuers should consider that in July 2009, the SEC proposed amendments to Rule 15c2-12 that included a proposal to delete the "if material" condition. This suggests that the SEC takes the position that any rating change warrants the filing of a material event notice with EMMA.
The municipal finance lawyers at Day Pitney LLP, including those listed on the right, have considerable experience advising municipal bond and note issuers on their continuing disclosure obligations. Please contact them if you have any questions or would like assistance in your analysis of the issues raised in this alert.
Day Pitney Alert
Joy Harmon Sperling and Rachel Packer wrote an article, "No Such Thing As A Free House? NJ Court Says Otherwise," for Law360. The article examines a recent unpublished opinion rendered by the Superior Court of New Jersey, Bergen County in Anim Investment Co. v. Shaloub, No. F-30508-15, 2015 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 3042 (Ch. Div. June 30, 2016).
Day Pitney Advisory
Judith Blank and Kristin Burgess authored the article, "Anti-discrimination rules for contractors expanded," for the Fairfield County Business Journal. The article discusses best practices for the recent changes in the state's nondiscrimination, affirmative action and supplier diversity program, and how statutes will be extended to municipalities and quasi-public agencies pursuant to recent legislation starting on October first.
Day Pitney LLP has once again been recognized as Connecticut's number one bond counsel firm by volume, serving as bond counsel on issues in Connecticut totaling approximately $1.7 billion in 2016, according to The Bond Buyer, a daily newspaper serving the municipal bond industry.
Day Pitney Press Release
Hartford, Conn., May 26, 2016 - Day Pitney LLP represented the State of Connecticut as lead bond counsel and disclosure counsel in a general obligation refunding bond sale of $501.4 million. The sale resulted in saving of $75.5 million in debt service costs over the life of the refinanced bonds. The Nappier administration has an active debt refunding program which has saved taxpayers $1.1 billion to date.
Hartford, CT, March 23, 2016 - Day Pitney LLP represented the State of Connecticut as disclosure counsel in a general obligation bond sale of $550 million.
Day Pitney was mentioned in an article, “Green Bonds Feature in Coming Connecticut GO Sale,” in The Bond Buyer. The firm was mentioned as lead bond counsel and lead disclosure counsel for the State of Connecticut’s sale of $650 million general obligation bond sale that includes a $65 million green-bond series. Day Pitney partners Namita Tripathi Shah, Judith Blank and Douglas Gillette are advising on the transaction, along with counsel Glenn Rybacki